The competitiveness scores for both Colorado and Arizona (the redesigned schemes and the schemes that are currently being used) are recorded in the table above. In the case of competitiveness index scores, lower percentages signify more competitiveness because lower percentages mean that on average, districts have more equal amounts of voters from the two political parties in them. Because the percentage score for Colorado's redesigned redistricting scheme was lower than the current scheme, it is more competitive. The same is true for Arizona's redesigned scheme compared to the districts from its current scheme. Then, Arizona was taken one step further and spatial analysis tests were ran on the redesigned districts in order to generate compactness scores for them. Compactness scores were generated using the Polsby-Popper Test, which ranges from a score of 0 (no compactness) to 1 (complete compactness). The redesigned districts for Arizona were, on average, more compact than the districts created by the Arizona independent redistricting commission. These results show that compact and competitive districts can be developed through adhering to the stratified sampling procedure of placing equal numbers of voters from the major political parties in the same district.